Obama’s Eligibility-The Facts   20 comments

The definitive Legal argument, concerning Obama’s Eligibility!

Intro! Obviously, I’m writing this for a reason. I’ve waited approximately 3 years, to write anything on this subject. Due to my life experiences, and some sage advice, I received from a friend a long time ago;

“Give a liar/liars, enough rope and time and they will eventually hang themselves”

So, Lets Get Started with: Who is Barak H. Obama II? Source:> (BillWhittleChannel@youtube.com)

Well I believe the time has come, I believe that this issue, will show the willful collusion and control that is acting upon our Government today, via Both Parties (Republican and Democrat). Through the banking oligarchy, the Corporations they control, Justice Department and Bar Association!

Please, Remember I am not arguing Obama’s birth or birthplace, at all! I will just present the facts per our founding fathers own writings, the actual applicable laws, and principles of said laws! Note: John McCain was just as ineligible as Obama!

Ultimately it is up to you to decide who is full of shit?

Note: I have included some videos to invoke thought! Also, to provide some entertainment. Please, note that they may also, say something, toward the societal issues we face today!

Any and all feed back is welcome!

If you are a U. S. Citizen you should give this article, your critical attention and study. This issue should be important to you and perhaps all people! I am however, highly doubtful you will! You will likely, just skip on by, what is likely to prove to be one of the most pervasive frauds ever successfully perpetrated on the American public.

I suspect you may be trying to take care of little Johnny who has just got picked up for stealing a candy bar, because; you are out of work, and he was hungry. It’s sad he will likely be punished more severely than the Usurper Obama. Or perhaps you will be the person saying, you know that little Jonny down the street, got caught stealing again; they need to put him in Juvenile detention?

It is my hope that some will take a critical look at this case, so you understand the serious implications it presents regarding the conduct of Human Civilization or Society!

If you think other wise, let me remind you of a few things:

1. Only one Country has been formed on the principles of Natural Law, as its Supreme Law, with the Citizenry as the final arbitrator.

2. World leaders are moving all people, to a one world system of governance. That at some point either by consent or by force you will be brought to make a decision.

3. Just how do you Crash an economy totally based on fictitious money (worthless paper) commonly known as Federal Reserve Notes, (Promissory Notes)? Better yet how deep does that hole go?

4. Today you have the right to determine the destiny of the United States and perhaps the World.

5. Tomorrow You May not. Per Thomas Jefferson:

“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies . . . If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] . . . will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered . . . The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.” — Thomas Jefferson — The Debate, Over the Re-charter Of The Bank Bill, (1809).

Please, click the link below, to watch a video concerning banking fraud! (Right Click to open in new Tab).

The Next Housing shock (CBS has apparently disabled the Embed option on youtube!)

Well, this has come to pass, the Banks and Corporations seem to be in control! Did you not wonder why the three people aren’t in orange Jump suits, for committing Fraud? Are you not amazed at how little it takes for our fellow Americans to sell out another for $10.00/hr? Are you not wondering how the 60 Minutes guy doesn’t present these questions?

I listen to people talk about the military power and economic might of America and that when the time comes Americans will stand their ground. But Consider this!

1. The Military arms are all created by and patented to Corporations. Where do you believe their loyalties lie?
2. Where have all our corporations moved their production or manufacturing facilities too?
3. Who actually owns these fictitious creations of Man?
4. How long would it take for these corporations to supply another country the same weapons they provide our military?
5. What will the Americans stand up for if they don’t even understand their own Government, as it was intended to be?
6. In what direction or Philosophical form of government will they turn to?

AGAIN, I ASK YOU TO TAKE THE TIME TO STUDY THIS MATERIAL! Make your own decisions as to their meanings and intentions! I have worked hard to organize this material in its historical timeline. I have also worked hard to limit my words and opinions as well as provide you some entertainment!

One might think that this is a trivial issue! That certainly no one could obtain the office of President illegally; I mean come on; can you imagine the scrutiny that would be placed on someone running for that office. Well, I definitely would have thought that! Prior to the election of 2008! I told member’s of my family that Obama wasn’t eligible. Then as the election approached I told my family that Obama would be elected.

You should know that my family has little to do with politics; we’re just your average working family. Just to give you a little background on myself, so you can understand where I’m coming from. I subscribe in large part to the philosophy of a man named John Locke. I enlisted and served in the Military for 20 years. I took the oath of Office, numerous times. I can still recite it by memory. So, given my Military service and my knowledge of the Oath, the requirements of service like the use of deadly force! Geneva Conventions, Economic and Military Doctrines as well as the many personal contacts one makes. It may be reasonable to assume, I may have studied the implications of laws a little more than the average Citizen.

Now, I will attempt to lay out the facts for you. However, you must be prepared to open your mind to concepts that have largely been removed and forgotten by our society and mostly achieved via or since the introduction of the Attorney”s Guild (Bar Association) and the Department of Education, which controls the content of Public Education. I will tell you; you may also, find yourself challenged by your own preconceived notions, primarily because of our education system and modern societal conditioning techniques. You may find it difficult, to actually read and understand this! (This is why I chose the video above). You may however, discover just how conditioned people really can become in our society and that enlightenment, may or may not be of good effect for you! I’m still working that issue myself! Anyway,

I will get started by pointing to a British Philosopher named John Locke, Please watch the next Video:

Were the writings of John Locke Plagiarized? You decide?

John Locke, Concerning Civil Government, 1693, second essay, Ch. 19: “Secondly: I answer, such revolutions happen not upon every little mismanagement in public affairs. Great mistakes in the ruling part, many wrong and inconvenient laws, and all the slips of human frailty will be borne by the people without mutiny or murmur. But if a long train of abuses, prevarications, and artifices, all tending the same way, make the design visible to the people, and they cannot but feel what they lie under, and see whither they are going, it is not to be wondered that they should then rouse themselves, and endeavor to put the rule into such hands which may secure to them the end for which government was at first erected…”

Thomas Jefferson, Declaration of Independence, 1776: “Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

Other references for your convenience, in the form of Audio Books: Should you choose to listen to them; I think we can certainly agree; that they are sufficient as to form the founders’ original intents; which must be considered when interpreting the constitution!

That they in fact use the word Natural enough to certainly show they understood it’s definition and or meaning, especially since they were primarily an agrarian society, making them much more in tune with Nature than we are today.

Just click on Titles Below!

Human Understanding By John Locke

Two Treatises of Government by John Locke<

Common Sense By Thomas Paine

Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death By Patrick Henry

The United States Declaration of Independence by Thomas Jefferson

Per John JAY – On 25 July 1787 he addressed a letter to George Washington, the Convention’s presiding officer, advancing the view that the Chief Executive should be a “natural-born citizen,” a suggestion to be embodied in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution. [10627, 12782] Quote and Sources listed below!

“Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American Army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.”

1. The Life John Jay with Selections from His Correspondence and Miscellaneous Papers. by His Son, William Jay in Two Volumes. Vol. II., 1833.

2. Columbia University: http://www.columbia.edu/cu/lweb/digital/exhibitions/constitution/essay.html

More Audio Links! Just click on Titles Below!

The U.S. Constitution Article One

Relevant Items:

Atricle 1, Sec 8, Clause 4: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

Article 1, Sec 8 Clause 10: To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;

The U.S. Constitution Article Two

Relevant Item:

Article 2, Sec 1, Clause 5: No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Notes:

1. The United States is the only Country created by foreigners (Non-Natives). Meaning none of them, were native to the land in origin.
2. The true Natives; The American Indians weren’t included in this new Society!
3. That you would have two separate and distinct societies on the same land!
4. That, given the legal argument presented in the Declaration of Independence, concerning Natural Law! The only conclusion logically derived is that they fully understood they were creating a new society under Natural Law and that anyone one, who was a natural born citizen or a citizen at the time of its creation would be the original “citizens’ and from then on the natives of it! So, the so called Grandfather Clause argument is just another sophism toward deception and wholly absurd.
5. It should be just as obvious that when a Monarch conquers new lands, the people are claimed as subjects of the Crown!

The U.S. Constitution Article Three

The U.S. Constitution Article Four

The U.S. Constitution Article Five

The U.S. Constitution Article Six

The U.S. Constitution Article Seven

First 10 amendments of the U.S. Constitution (Bill of Rights)!

Amendments 11-13 of the U. S. Constitution

Amendments 14-19 of the U. S. Constitution

An Excellent Video on the 14th Amendment, with full Support from the Congressional Record!

References from above Video:

The Un-Constitutionality of Citizenship by Birth to Non-Americans
http://www.14thamendment.us/articles/anchor_babies_unconstitutionality.html
———————————

http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llcg&fileName=073/llcg073.db&&#8230;
page 2890 (link above)
page 2893 (link above)
page 2895 (link above)
page 2893 (link above)
page 2897 (link above)

http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llcg&fileName=071/llcg071.db&&#8230;
Page 1291
———————————
Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856: From Gales and …
By United States. Congress, Thomas Hart Benton (Page 186)

http://books.google.com/books?id=DmkFAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA186&dq=%22without+&#8230;

Amendments 20-22 of the U. S. Constitution

Amendments 23-27 of the U. S. Constitution

So, hopefully, you have chosen to take the walk through America’s history and Listened to the writings provided by our Founding Fathers! If you have, I would think the following points must be undeniable.

1. That when they founded this country (The United States of America) based on the recognition of two separate and distinct principles of Law!

a. The first being that of Natural Law other wise known as American Common Law! (Note: This Differs greatly from the constructs of English Common Law! Which was introduced as a legal structure, for use by the commoner’s? Essentially, it is the King’s Law, passed down to the Commoner’s as you can see, this only provided limited interaction of the Citizenry and left the King (a single man, as the ultimate arbitrator) and was based on Precedents from the king and Common Law Courts as a result of Jury trials, to allow for greater participation and access of the commoner’s to legal methods of redress to settle their disputes in civil/common courts of the Monarchy).

b. The Second being Man’s Law, with the U. S. Constitution Limiting the powers and thereby the government’s ability to create or institute new Law’s, on its citizenry and thereby making the Citizenry the ultimate arbitrator of the law itself. Notes:

a. This fully supported within The U. S. Code: Title 8, 1401, as well: Which is provided for your review see paragraph 6. below, as irrifutable evidence.

b. The laws very own Title TITLE 8 – ALIENS AND NATIONALITY, CHAPTER 12 – IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY SUBCHAPTER III – NATIONALITY AND NATURALIZATION.

c. And per U. S. Code: Title 8, section 1401, subparagraph b. where is states the following:

“(b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe: Provided, That the granting of citizenship under this subsection shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of such person to tribal or other property;”

This also, fully supports the Natural Law construct, as it serves as a protection to the individuals Natural Law right to claim his tribal Citizenship, thus allowing the individual to request U. S. Citizenship; Making, the individual a Naturalized Citizen, via this very Article. (Via Man’s Law).

d. This also, supports the various United States Treaties, with these Tribes who still exist to this day, as Sovereign Nations with in our borders. Which is why they must be considered Naturalized Citizens!

2. That your individual rights in fact come from Natural Law! As Provided by the Creator of the Natural World! Natures God! Not from man.

3. That they instituted the Constitution of the United States among Men. To organize a government, whose purpose was to protect the Individual rights, of Man. by limiting the Powers of the Government they created.

4. That Per U. S. Constitution, Article II, Section I, Clause 5 – “No person except a Natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution” shall be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.

5. That a person Born Of the land of the United States, whose parents are also born of land of the United States, are in fact Natural Born Citizens. Per the very principles of Natural Law and as such their Citizenship is a Natural Right, not dependent on the laws of man.

6. That others may though Immigration and Naturalization Laws (Man’s Law) can be granted Citizenship. Per The U. S. Code: Title 8, 1401. Which Was taken verbatim from this website; as follows?

U.S. Code Title 8, Section 1401 Click: to go to House.Gov Website!

According to, 8 USC Sec. 1401 01/07/2011 TITLE 8 – ALIENS AND NATIONALITY CHAPTER 12 – IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY SUBCHAPTER III – NATIONALITY AND NATURALIZATION Part I –
Nationality at Birth and Collective Naturalization -HEAD- Sec. 1401. Nationals and citizens of United States at birth -STATUTE- 

The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
(a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;

(b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe: Provided, That the granting of citizenship under this subsection shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of such person to tribal or other property;

Please, Note:

1. This also, fully supports the Natural Law construct, as it serves as a protection to the individuals Natural Law right to claim his tribal Citizenship, thus allowing the individual to request U. S. Citizenship; Making, the individual a Naturalized Citizen, via this very Article. (Via Man’s Law).

2. This also, supports the various United States Treaties, with these Tribes who still exist to this day, as Sovereign Nations with in our borders. Which is why they must be considered Naturalized Citizens!

(c) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person;

(d) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the birth of such person, and the other of whom is a national, but not a citizen of the United States;

(e) a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person;

(f) a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States;

(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288 of title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person (A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or (B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 288 of title 22, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date; and

(h) a person born before noon (Eastern Standard Time) May 24, 1934, outside the limits and jurisdiction of the United States of an alien father and a mother who is a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, had resided in the United States.

-SOURCE- (June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title III, ch. 1, Sec. 301, 66 Stat. 235; Pub. L. 89-770, Nov. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 1322; Pub. L. 92-584, Secs. 1, 3, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1289; Pub. L. 95-432, Secs. 1, 3, Oct. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 1046; Pub. L. 99-653, Sec. 12, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3657; Pub. L. 103-416, title I, Sec. 101(a), Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4306.) -MISC1- 

AMENDMENTS 1994 – Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 103-416 added subsec. (h). 1986 – Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 99-653 substituted “five years, at least two” for “ten years, at least five”. 1978 – Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 95-432, Sec. 3, struck out “(a)” before “The following” and redesignated pars. (1) to (7) as (a) to (g), respectively. Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 95-432, Sec. 1, struck out subsec. (b) which provided that any person who was a national or citizen of the United States under subsec. (a)(7) lose his nationality or citizenship unless he be continuously physically present in the United States for a period of not less than two years between the ages of 14 and 28 or that the alien parent be naturalized while the child was under 18 years of age and the child began permanent residence in the United States while under 18 years of age and that absence from the United States of less than 60 days not break the continuity of presence. Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 95-432, Sec. 1, struck out subsec. (c) which provided that former subsec. (b) apply to persons born abroad subsequent to May 24, 1934, except that this not be construed to alter the citizenship of any person born abroad subsequent to May 24, 1934 who, prior to the effective date of this chapter, had taken up residence in the United States before attaining 16 years of age, and thereafter, whether before or after the effective date of this chapter, complied with the residence requirements of section 201(g) and (h) of the Nationality Act of 1940. Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 95-432, Sec. 1, struck out subsec. (d) which provided that nothing in former subsec. (b) be construed to alter the citizenship of any person who came into the United States prior to Oct. 27, 1972, and who, whether before or after Oct. 27, 1972, immediately following such coming complied with the physical presence requirements for retention of citizenship specified in former subsec. (b), prior to amendment of former subsec. (b) by Pub. L. 92-584. 1972 – Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 92-584, Sec. 1, substituted provisions that nationals and citizens of the United States under subsec. (a)(7), lose such status unless they are present continuously in the United States for two years between the ages of fourteen and twenty eight years, or the alien parent is naturalized while the child is under the age of eighteen years and the child begins to reside permanently in the United States while under the age of eighteen years, and that absence from the United States of less than sixty days will not break the continuity of presence, for provisions that such status would be lost unless the nationals and citizens come to the United States prior to attaining twenty three years and be present continuously in the United States for five years, and that such presence should be between the age of fourteen and twenty eight years. Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 92-584, Sec. 3, added subsec. (d). 1966 – Subsec. (a)(7). Pub. L. 89-770 authorized periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization by the citizen parent, or any periods during which the citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person (A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or (B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization, to be included in order to satisfy the physical presence requirement, and permitted the proviso to be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952. EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1986 AMENDMENT Section 23(d) of Pub. L. 99-653, as added by Pub. L. 100-525, Sec. 8(r), Oct. 24, 1988, 102 Stat. 2619, provided that: “The amendment made by section 12 [amending this section] shall apply to persons born on or after November 14, 1986.” EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1978 AMENDMENT Section 1 of Pub. L. 95-432 provided that the amendment made by that section is effective Oct. 10, 1978. EFFECTIVE DATE Chapter effective 180 days after June 27, 1952, see section 407 of act June 27, 1952, set out as a note under section 1101 of this title. WAIVER OF RETENTION REQUIREMENTS Section 101(b) of Pub. L. 103-416 provided that: “Any provision of law (including section 301(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act [8 U.S.C. 1401(b)] (as in effect before October 10, 1978), and the provisos of section 201(g) of the Nationality Act of 1940 [former 8 U.S.C. 601(g)]) that provided for a person’s loss of citizenship or nationality if the person failed to come to, or reside or be physically present in, the United States shall not apply in the case of a person claiming United States citizenship based on such person’s descent from an individual described in section 301(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (as added by subsection (a)).” RETROACTIVE APPLICATION OF 1994 AMENDMENT Section 101(c) of Pub. L. 103-416 provided that: “(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the immigration and nationality laws of the United States shall be applied (to persons born before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 25, 1994]) as though the amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section], and subsection (b) [enacting provisions set out above], had been in effect as of the date of their birth, except that the retroactive application of the amendment and that subsection shall not affect the validity of citizenship of anyone who has obtained citizenship under section 1993 of the Revised Statutes [former 8 U.S.C. 6] (as in effect before the enactment of the Act of May 24, 1934 (48 Stat. 797)). “(2) The retroactive application of the amendment made by subsection (a), and subsection (b), shall not confer citizenship on, or affect the validity of any denaturalization, deportation, or exclusion action against, any person who is or was excludable from the United States under section 212(a)(3)(E) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(3)(E)) (or predecessor provision) or who was excluded from, or who would not have been eligible for admission to, the United States under the Displaced Persons Act of 1948 [former 50 U.S.C. App. 1951 et seq.] or under section 14 of the Refugee Relief Act of 1953 [former 50 U.S.C. App. 1971l].” APPLICABILITY OF TRANSMISSION REQUIREMENTS Section 101(d) of Pub. L. 103-416, as amended by Pub. L. 104-208, div. C, title VI, Sec. 671(b)(1), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009- 721, provided that: “This section [amending this section and enacting provisions set out above], the amendments made by this section, and any retroactive application of such amendments shall not effect the application of any provision of law relating to residence or physical presence in the United States for purposes of transmitting United States citizenship to any person whose claim is based on the amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] or through whom such a claim is derived.” ADMISSION OF ALASKA AS STATE Alaska Statehood provisions as not conferring, terminating, or restoring United States nationality, see section 21 of Pub. L. 85- 508, July 7, 1958, 72 Stat. 339, set out as a note preceding former section 21 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.

7. That it is common knowledge that Naturalized Citizens are not eligible to be President. That its thus, absolutely absurd to think that anyone who obtains citizenship utilizing “Immigration and Naturalization Law” can be anything, but a Naturalized Citizen; and thus obviously can’t be considered Constitutionally eligible for the Office of President of the United States.

8 The only Definition I’ve found on Natural Born Citizen
Source See:> Link to the Law of Nation by Emmerich de Vattel Book 1, § 212

§ 212 Citizens and natives.
The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.

9. The very definitions of the word Natural:
a. Begotten without the sanction of law.
b. Not acquired; inherent:
c. Being in accordance with or determined by nature.
d. Having or constituting a classification based on features existing in nature.
e. Living in or as if in a state of nature untouched by the influences of civilization and society.

10. That the only course of action that can legally change this requirement, would be in the form of an amendment, of which there are 27 and not one of them states anything concerning the eligibility to be President, or makes even a remote reference to The U. S. Constitution, Article II, Section I, Clause 5.

11. Given the fact that this is a Constitutional requirement and that no case on the subject has ever been brought before the Supreme Court, which makes it blatantly obvious; that The Supreme Court has never rendered a decision concerning the eligibility of anyone to be President of the United States.

12. That the eligibility to President is unequivocally a constitutional Requirement that must be met for a person to be President. That, no person can legally hold the office of President without meeting the requirements per the U. S. Constitution, Article II, Section I, Clause 5.

13. That any reference to case Law, concerning citizenship merely deals with Immigration and Naturalization Law, in any Court including the Supreme Court must be considered wholly irrelevant, to the requirements to hold the office of President. U. S. Constitution, Article II, Section I, Clause 5

14. That any reasonable person reviewing the facts as provided above can only concur that this person known as Barack Hussein Obama II. Is clearly ineligible to hold the Office of President! Has Committed Fraud on and against the American People! That he has and is currently continuing to usurp the power of the Office of President.

As to how this happened and what to do about it? Well, here are a couple of Supreme Court Justices, saying what they are doing about it, in their own words.

Well, I thought it was Common Knowledge that a Naturalized Citizen wasn’t Eligible! Do you really think they don’t know Obama is illegally holding the Office of President?

We are evading that issue, did they not take an Oath, and wouldn’t that be treason to knowingly let the Usurper Serve? Well, I guess; it’s obviously in the hands of people, people like you; should you yourself be a Citizen of the United States of America. I look forward to your responses!

R/ Bubba Butt

Advertisements

Posted April 16, 2011 by bubbabutt

20 responses to “Obama’s Eligibility-The Facts

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. As written in the Bible, this is Eve’s and her first born son, Cain’s world! No? Watch! While someone else(Yahshua) has qualified to replace him, not yet with “Eve”(Ask Obama) still in charge!

    Victor Barney, LeHigh Acres, Florida 33971
    • Well, in America, God would rule! Not a man! As for Cain and his brother Abel brought offerings to God; Cain of the first-fruits and Abel, a shepherd, of the firstlings of his flock (Gen 4:3-4). Without giving any reason, God accepted only the offering of Abel. Angered at this rejection, Cain killed his brother (Gen 4:8), so I think God may have changed his mind. However, the historical content is of use, if one does not wish to relive the past and or it’s transgressions! As a society do you think we are reliving the past? Committing the same basic transgressions against one another!

  2. Hebrew, not Greek, Latin, or even English is the “only” spiritually inspired language(Zeph. 3:9, Acts 26:14 and
    1 Cor. 4:6) and if you can’t believe that, nothing that i can say will help! p.s., “Jesus” a name requested by Pope Leo the 10th to Petrus Galatinus in 1522 AD, his Church philosopher, was a name given to honor “Zeus” the highest Greek Deity, which was a Roman custom! Does breaking the commandents matter? If you think not, then go with it!

    Victor Barney, LeHigh Acres, Florida 33971
    • Victor, Do you find something offensive to God! or the Bible! in either the U.S. Declaration of Independence or the Original Constituttion of the United states.

  3. Yes I do! We are commanded to prove all things from the Hebrew, where we find Elohim as his title and Yahweh as is Name! We are commanded not to worship Baal, and in the Hebrew worshipping in the “Lord” is called Baal worship! Did I also mention that the name “Jesus” was given Pope Leo the 10th actually to worship “Zeus?” Yes, I have problems with those deductively proven biblical lies, as we are commanded in the same writings! It’s also written that the whole world would be deceived, isn’t it?

    Victor Barney, LeHigh Acres, Florida 33971
    • Victor, I find no where in declaration or the Constitution, where you would be commanded to prove anything about your religious views. So exactly how is what you’re saying relevant, to my questions or arguments? Per my studies; I find nothing in these two documents’ containing any thing that should cast anything even remotely disparaging or otherwise offensive against your religious views. Please, refer me to where you find these command’s.

  4. Our Constitution does give to the “Right” to be wrong! That’s what was so great about it! However, that is before Karl Marx in 1848 introduced “intellectualizing” about Lucifer’s angle, as Eve had done right from the beginning. Lucifer’s lies creeps into everything that man does during this present age, if allowed, but ONLY if it is by our “choice!” Consider Elohim(Hebrew, a title) to be true and all men liars! Also, remember that England and America were promised to possess the greatest civil empire in history(Gen., 48:16), which England alone already had accomplished! There was nothing really left, but for u.s. to reject his truth! You can think about it(Rejecting the Truth), but DON’T DO IT, if you want to be saved during the FIRST GO-AROUND!!!

    Victor Barney, LeHigh Acres, Florida 33971
    • Well. I can agree that it does give the individual the right to be wrong. The Bible warns us to be careful about judging others. When we do, we are condemning ourselves because we do the same things for which we pass judgment on others (Romans 2:1). So I generally have less faith in man. While I try to reserve making my judgments’ of others/things until I can find relevant examples with similarity of cause and effect in the Natural world that god provides all around us.

      So, if you’re saying, the nation as whole has forgotten the constitution and the natural order of things, as created by God! Then, I guess were in agreement. This is why I started this blog and choose the eligibility issue, as a topic. I believe if people can understand the fundamentals of the founding principals of the United States. This will lead people to understanding the uniqueness of America! Thus bring people back to the Natural world and thus its creator!

  5. Pingback: Gutfeld on Red Eye: Why McCotter Should Run for President (4.22.2011) « bubbabutt

  6. Pingback: Who is Barrak H. Obama II « bubbabutt

  7. Your interpration of “uniqueness of America” is just what has happened to our freedom, just as it happened in the garden of Eden with Eve(“intellectualizing”)! No? Hang-around for another 1 1/2 years and we’ll talk again! Watch!
    p.s. Hebrew is “only” inspired language, not Greek, Latin, or even English(Zeph. 3:9, Acts 26:14, 1 Cor. 4:6) and in Hebrew our Deity is named “Yahweh” our “Elohim” and NOT “The LORD”(Baal in Hebrew, which is forbidden) our “GOD” the deity of good luck for the Babylonians! Watch!

    Victor Barney, LeHigh Acres, Florida 33971
  8. bubbabutt, May our Yahshua(“Yahweh means salvation”)Bless you!!! You’re right on!!! We’ll be together when it counts, and—count means absolute life! It will not be much longer, but it could become difficult for some. Pray not! Watch!

    Victor Barney, LeHigh Acres, Florida 33971
  9. I just have an “IDEA” they we will meet on 12/22/2012!
    Watch!!!

    Victor Barney, LeHigh Acres, Florida 33971
  10. p.s.: bubbabutt, I even have your name reserved!!! Watch!

    Victor Barney, LeHigh Acres, Florida 33971
  11. Pingback: White House releases Obama birth certificate! Can Americans really be this stupid? « bubbabutt

  12. Pingback: White House releases Obama birth certificate! « bubbabutt

  13. Simply wish to say your article is as surprising. The clearness in your post is just nice and i could assume you are an expert on this subject. Well with your permission allow me to grab your feed to keep updated with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please keep up the enjoyable work.

  14. All I want to add, the secret of reading the Scriptures is actually given in it when it states that all Scriptural passages must be read only through the process of scientific deduction and nothing else( 2 Peter 1:20)! And, it works!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: